Search This Blog

Showing posts with label Gray. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gray. Show all posts

Friday, August 14, 2026

Will of Thomas Bowles 1819

 Thomas Bowles of Great Marlow. Will written 1814, proved 1819. An awkwardly expressed will in the beginning.

Says that he is sick and weak but of sound mind and memory.

To loving wife Elizabeth and her assigns all the houses he is possessed of with their appurtenances and all other of his personal property until the children reach 21. Certain of the properties go to various of the children as they each reach the 21 milestone, as described below. She can still have the house he lives in and any residual property for the term of her natural life unless she remarries. When she dies or remarries son William to have it.

Daughter Sarah at age 21 to receive the house next door with appurtenances and the long back house adjoining it.

Son Thomas at age 21 the house with appurtenances in testator's own occupation [so he is using a second house too as the one he lives in was previously mentioned in the will. The second house may have been a place of business or storage] next door to Manus Gray [probably meant to be Parmenus Gray who witnessed the will. The testator was likely using a friendly short form of the name when he gave it as Menas. The name Parmenas /Parmenus in various forms was traditional in the Gray / Grey  family of Marlow].

Son James at age 21 house with appurtenances in the occupation of John Harding.

The child that the testator's wife is pregnant with will receive £50 over and above it's share of his residual estate as described below.

All household goods and furniture to his wife for life. All residual estate to be invested and wife Elizabeth to receive the income from that in her lifetime. Afterwards the principle sum to be divided equally between his children.

Executors his wife and his brother James Bowles.

Testator signed only with a mark.

Witnessed by John Allnutt, Jno. Mossenton and Parmenus Gray.

Will was proved by the brother James Gray with power to administer also reserved to the other executor Elizabeth.

NOTES=

"Jno" (a common way of rendering both John and Jonathan on paper) Mossenton was probably the cordwainer of Chapel Street John Mossenton.

Will transcribed and summarised by me Charlotte Day from an original at the National Archives, Kew. Notes also by Charlotte.

Well over 100 wills of Marlow people are on this blog. See the wills index here

For every mention of any individual on this blog please see the A-Z Person Index. There are lots of Bowles!

©Marlow Ancestors. Reuse for family or local history purposes freely permitted with credit to this blog.

Thursday, January 29, 2026

Life in 1500s Marlow


The 1500s Town -

The very earliest reference to a named street in Marlow that I have found is the will of Robert Sands of Harleyford, proved 1509, in which the testator left his daughter Jane a house and plot in Oxford Lane, now called Oxford Road. West Street is mentioned in 1574 and a little later we hear of "Hawkins Lane" leading to Hawkins Farm. We know too that the High Street, Dean Street, Spittal Street, Chapel Street, St Peter Street (and what we now call Station Road leading to it), Old Pound Lane and the part of Pound Lane which connects old Pound Lane to the High Street all existed in the 1500s though not necessarily under those names in all cases. In the first few years of the 1600s Quoiting Square (as Quoiting Place) and Potlands are mentioned and it is safe to assume that they were also present in the 1500s. The Potlands (note not "Portlands" as today) area included a footpath down to the river and church. This is now known as Portland Alley. It has been speculated that this might have been an actual roadway in the even more distant past. Similarly the idea of an old roadway connecting Spittal Street at around the site of the Cross Keys to St Peter's Street has been floated. In the 1610s we find mention of the Medmenham Highway (now Henley Road), Dedmere Highway (Dedmere Road) and Gun Lane (now Trinity Road). All were likely also present in the late 1500s at least.

The Danger of Smoke Free Homes..

In the collaborative Hollinshed's Chronicle of England, Scotland and Ireland published in 1577 writer William Harrison wrote that there had been recently a huge increase in domestic building in England. "Never so much oke hath been spent in a hundred years before as in ten years of our time, for everie man almost is a builder, and he that hath bought any small parcel of ground, be it ever so little, will not be quiet till he have pulled downe the old house if anie were there standing, and set up a new after his own device" As well as the new cottages and houses springing up there was much expansion and alteration to the older style homes of the rich. 

The population of England had grown considerably, doubling since the 1510s, so the need for new properties was obvious. It is likely therefore that the footprint of Marlow grew during the Elizabethan era and that individual streets became more crowded with buildings.

The building boom led to a nationwide shortage of timber by the end of the 1500s. Brick and stone buildings were both now commonly used for homes for the better off but wood was still needed for them. According to architectural historian Nickolaus Pevesner the hall of the Old Parsonage in St Peter Street Marlow was constructed the previous century if not earlier, of chalk with stone windows which shows another option that 1500s housebuilders of Marlow may also have used. There was a chalk pit up at Harleyford by the 1550s. The origin of the Old Parsonage is not certainly known.

The raising of the oak frame of a timber framed house occured once the frame had been left to season for a while by the carpenter who crafted it. The raising must have been a significant job, and probably involved helpers other than the householder and carpenter's workmen as it was common to have a little feast, drink distribution and celebration on the day of the raising, which sounds like a community thankyou. 

If you think of a timber framed building of the 1500s you probably picture a black and white or black wood and brick structure but according to the authors of The Cottage Homes of England this blackening of the wood was often done artificially in the 1800s, and Tudor woodwork would have been left naturally greyish most of the time. I have seen elsewhere however reports of house frames being "burnt" before use which implies possible deliberate darkening of the wood. Perhaps it was down to individual choice.

Only a few people had glass windows, the rest had holes in the wall, covered by translucent cloth. Floors downstairs in humble cottages were often of compacted earth. These were skillfully laid and not quite the equivalent of kicking around in the mud as you might imagine. Don't worry though, with unpaved streets 1500s Marlovians had plenty of opportunity to squelch their way about the town following any rainfall.

Chimneys had become common by the mid Elizabethan era, and indeed fancy chimneys, were a status symbol. Poorer people still made do by and large with a hole in the roof to allow the escape of smoke. Some household smoke was thought to cure and strengthen the timber used in the construction, and even to make the inhabitants healthier! It also smoked any cheese or meat hung from the beams and rafters of the house. For this reason the clearing of the air in the home caused by new efficient chimneys was regretted by more than a few people, including William Harrison. He couldn't believe the amount of coughing, choking and rheumatism caused by living in a smoke free home!

Smoke would have deterred domestic flies but it doesn't seem that mice found it too off-putting. Though keeping cats as mousers was common, an attitude of resignation as to living with some mice had to prevail. There were as yet no daddy long legs spiders in English homes however. They cadged a lift on ships from warmer climbs a century later.

A surge in home furnishings also occurred in the homes of all but the poorest (but remember that they made up the majority of the English population). William Harrison wrote that inferior artisans and mean farmers (his description!) "have for the most part learned also to garnish their cupboards with plate, their beds with tapestries and silke hangings, and their tables with carpets and fine naperie".

All household items cost far more in real terms than they do today so that items that we would not consider special were seen as worth singling out as gifts for loved ones and friends in wills. Reynold Shirwood of Marlow who left his will in 1528 as well as his valuable pewter bequeathed tablecloths and napkins. His wife Margaret mentioned napkins too and even a towel alongside her more obviously valuable amber beads, ring, girdle and raw cash.

The poorest people lived in cottages with one or two room downstairs, often with sleeping compartments reached by ladder above them. A yeoman family usually had more rooms downstairs, and might have a fully floored upper storey for sleeping, though that was still reached by ladder not a staircase. It is presumed that any people who could not manage ladders would bed themselves down on the lower floors. Most beds were straw filled pallets. Homeowners could expect beds with frames on which hangings for warmth and privacy could be attached, but other family members in the same household were not always so lucky. Servants did not expect any covering on their beds beyond an over sheet, and maybe not even that.

William, Lord Paget had Great Marlow Manor by grant from Queen Mary in 1554. The manor had been in Crown hands since early in the reign of Henry 8th. Tucher Bold had Harleyford Manor Marlow from 1516. In 1542 he got a license to have a preacher there to officiate worship as his home was so far from the parish church in Marlow. William Lord Paget ended up holding both Harleyford and Great Marlow. The other Marlow manors of the day were Semers or Seymours and Widmere. John, Lord Russell occupied Widmere from 1571. Earlier it was held successively by the Widmere family, the Knight Templars and Knight Hospitallers. 

Little Marlow Manor was in the hands of the abbess of the priory there, until of course the Dissolution.

Commercial life

Marlow is known to have had multiple inns and the like during the 1500s. The Upper Crown existed by 1596 (where Boots is now). Shopkeepers usually served customers from their homes. Marlow for generations had had two fairs a year which provided additional retail opportunities, as did the weekly market. In later times this market focused on meat sales but there is no reason to think it was not a general market in the 1500s.

Self-sufficiency was key for most people rather than commercial consumption. A cottage's garden was the medicine chest, perfumery, and culinary flavouring resource for it's residents. Some would keep bees for honey. It is often said that honey was the only sweetener available in England before the arrival of sugar but that is not strictly true. Sweet birch sap, and pollen from various flowers were available. Sucking the sweet young flowers of white dead nettles was the 1500s version of sucking a lollypop for the kids. Linden tree blossom could also be sucked as a sweet and made into a floral-scented tea. The roots and leaves of angelica plants, cultivated in gardens, also sweetened dishes.

The Bridge 

There had been a bridge crossing the Thames at Marlow since at least the late 1200s. It is presumed that the bridge of 1500s Marlow and earlier stood at the bottom of St Peter Street, as the new bridge constructed in the 1780s certainly did. Davy Shirwood / Sherwood left money for the repair of Marlow Bridge in his 1524 will. Historically the people of Marlow seem to have been pretty poor at maintaining the structure despite our bridge trustees having multiple pieces of land in their hands to rent out and thus gain income for necessary repairs. 

The People

While most people were not too far ranging during their lifetime it shouldn't be presumed that all the residents of the town in the 1500s were from ancient Marlow families. Not many of the last names of 1500s Marlovians were names that had been present in the 1400s and vice versa, implying plenty of population movement, even if it was only to and from the wider local area. A 1524 tax list for the town shows us one resident had come much further away - Henry Conrade the Dutchman. He'd be subject as a foreigner to additional tax. His occupation isn't known though quite a few Dutch and Flemish iron workers came to England at this time. I have some in my own family, though they set up in the Sussex Weald, a known iron making area, rather than Buckinghamshire. 

The countryside

It is an open question as to how native the beech woods of South Buckinghamshire are. What we see today may be largely the result of human manipulation due to the needs of the later furniture trade. That's not to say that beech trees are not native to England, or that the woods around Marlow did not anciently contain beeches. It is thought however that the woods started out as a mix of beech and other native species, most of which were slowly removed by humans so that mixed woodland became beech dominant woodland.  Whatever woods there were would have been used as foraging spots for Marlow's free ranging domestic pigs by those residents who had pannage rights.

Work

Agricultural labouring would have occupied the majority of men, and women also worked on the land as a matter of routine. Marlow wills suggest that sheep were the predominant livestock kept in the town. Married couple Margaret and Reynold Shirwood who died within days of each other, probably from a contagious illness, in 1528 mention in their wills growing barley and wheat. They were clearly doing well as Margaret specified that her farm cart is a horse cart. Horses were expensive and the use of oxen was more usual. She also talked of the ploughs and harrows that she possessed in plural terms, so we know that she and Reynold could make use of at least two teams of workers at once when it came to ploughing and harrowing.

Farms known to have existed in the 1500s are: Blounts, Seymour Court Farm then just known as Seymours or Seymers and presumably part of the lost manor of Seymers, Hawkins Farm, and in Little Marlow Monkton Farm. Most of what we now consider Marlow would have been only farmland. Large swathes of land, were kept as common fields and divided into strips for individual holders. This system would continue for many years after the 1500s.

Field boundaries where they existed historically in England were mostly banks and ditches with a hedge of hawthorn atop the bank. Hawthorn known then as quickthorn or maythorn was chosen as it makes such a good animal barrier. Hedgerows were also strategically planted at intervals with those trees whose leaves provided extra fodder for livestock (cows love young lime leaves and other trees have foliage that can be dried and used for animals in the winter), or berries and hazelnuts for humans. 

Even those who had other trades frequently farmed some land as well. 

I published a reconstructed 1500s trade directory on the blog last year which can be read here. As you will see from that post I found multiple men in Marlow occupied as bargemen, butchers, carpenters, innkeepers (who were often brewers too or at least their wives were), shoemakers and weavers. We also found one off individuals who were bakers, blacksmiths, drapers, glove makers, millwrights, and wood merchants. Obviously we can recover traces of the occupations of only a fraction of Marlow people during this time. Commercial fisherman on the Thames at Marlow are known earlier and later so we can safely presume they existed in the 1500s. 

Servants in grand houses such as the manors were usually male with the exception of laundresses and dairy maids. Only less well off families employed female servants (who were cheaper but carried no distinction). The male and female employees of farming families were routinely referred to as servants despite spending much of or all of their day out working on the land rather than in tasks we would associate with "servants". The word servant also referred to trade apprentices and shop assistants.

Young boys were sent out to fulfill apprenticeships as far afield as London if the example of young Peter Russell of Marlow apprenticed in 1512 is anything to go by.

Religion

The All Saints of the 1500s (not the church we see today) seems to have had a chapel dedicated to Saint Mary and probably still had an altar sacred to Saint Anne as it had done back in 1495 when Radulph Carter wrote his will and mentioned it. When chantry chapels were shut down by Henry 8th the one at Marlow was worth £8 13 shillings and 4 pence. The chantry priest then was a Sir James Grai (Grey, Gray, one of the most common last names in 1500s Marlow, probably in fact the most common).

The church warden accounts of the late 1500s show that the church bells, the ringing apparatus and the clock (vital for the town as virtually no one had any timepiece at home) required constant expenditure. A visit by Elizabeth 1st to Bisham caused one of the bells to be hastily mended in order for her to be saluted. Well you didn't want to upset Queen Lizzie did you? The church bells in the late 1500s were routinely rung at the anniversary of her coronation and on St Hugh's Day. I know what you're thinking- Saint who? Hugh's not well known today but he was once Bishop of Lincoln and Lincoln was the mother church of Marlow. Wills of 1500s Marlovians often mention gifts to the mother church as well as to Marlow church itself. Hugh's feast day was in November. He was the patron saint of amongst other things sick children, and appropriately for Marlow, swans. His pet swan at Lincoln had guarded him while he slept and followed him everywhere he went. 

Above, medieval St Hugh. Public domain image.


In 1595 some players were paid by the church to "play" in the "church loft" the location of which isn't certainly known. Presumably these were performing a religious play for the townspeople. The payment was made in May, the traditional time for Mummers plays. As well as the Church Loft there was also an unplaced "church house" in Marlow. Church lofts are referenced elsewhere, including at West Wycombe, where it was a separate building (and still exists). The phrase could also refer to the musicians' gallery common to churches then and which was usually sited above the rood screen. Plays could be performed on such galleries.

The churchwardens had custody of a set of morris dancing costumes. They were willing to let other parishes borrow these. What morris dancing, rooted as it was in pagan pre-Christian rituals, was thought to have to do with the work of the church is anyone's guess. May Day or midsummer celebrations were the main times for Morris dancing in Tudor England. 

Talking of unusual articles kept in a church, in some earlier Tudor parishes a communal plough was stored there ready for anyone to borrow but there is no evidence of this occurring in Marlow church.

At Little Marlow stood a church dedicated to St John and a small, moated Benedictine priory dedicated to the Virgin Mary. The priory was home to five to six nuns at a time. Margaret Vernun, prioress at the time of the Dissolution, received a transfer to the famous abbey of Malling in Kent, which would have been a significant promotion- albeit a short lived one as that was also forced to close just a couple of years later. The priory site at Little Marlow was given briefly to Bisham Abbey then leased to Elizabeth Restwold and John Titley. Elizabeth was already leasing some of the Priory's other lands when the nuns first left.

Margaret Vernun's origin is unknown but she was clearly from a wealthy family, most prioresses were. Before being based at Little Marlow she had served at St Albans. Margaret was a friend of Thomas Cromwell, to whom she wrote many times. How they met is unknown but the friendship was genuine. She kept and educated his son Gregory at her priory, and it appears Thomas visited her socially at Little Marlow. She and her other nuns had also gone to dine with him and invited him to Little Marlow in return. Entertaining one of the King's senior ministers was perfectly acceptable for a cloistered woman. Nuns in this era don't generally seem to have been as closed off from the world of men as we might suppose, indeed it wasn't an option for any prioress or abbess to live that way. They were landlords and administrators of the finances of their institution, ladies of business. The priory held lands not only in Little Marlow, but at various times also at Great Marlow, Hambledon, High Wycombe, Penn, Taplow, Wendover, Colebrook, Weston Turville, Beaconsfield and Benfield in Berkshire. At one point Margaret borrowed money from Cromwell in order to buy some extra land for the priory which she knew she could quickly turn a profit on. 

The nuns of course had a live-in male chaplain for mass and confession. In 1835 Margaret paid him £5 6 shillings 8d a year. At least one priest engaged by Margaret for her nuns at Little Marlow brought with him his own pupil which he had previously been engaged to educate. It was the norm for parish priests to supplement their incomes by taking in pupils so it is likely that the priest at All Saints church in Marlow had his own little "school" too. No other known educational provision existed in 1500s Marlow.

The taking in of both male and female residential pupils was also very common for 1500s priories. Cromwell junior had left Margaret not long before the Dissolution but Margaret was hoping towards the end of the Priory's life to negotiate the arrival of new residential pupil, a little girl that she had heard of as staying in Bisham. Margaret hoped that if she came the girl would be a comfort to Margaret in her "old age". We know she had had multiple pupils at St Albans and pupils before Gregory Cromwell at Little Marlow too. Such children came from well off families and it is presumed those families paid well for the privilege. A male teacher was provided by his father for Gregory Cromwell at the Little Marlow Priory with Margaret supervising his work. Another little boy shared his lessons. The bringing in of outside teachers seems to have been the usual way of serving the pupils in priories.

As well as her income from pupils and land rentals Margaret raised money by selling wood. The priory owned 8 acres of woodland. Her priory was also entitled to offerings from a chapel at Colebrook, for unknown reasons.

Margaret's distress at the impending loss of her Little Marlow home was poured out in her letters. She pleaded with Cromwell to do what he could for her and her fellow nuns. He secured her the Malling post.When Malling too stood on the brink she again wrote asking to be allowed to sell one of the manors belonging to Malling to fund either a one off lump sum retirement payment or ongoing pensions for her nuns. There was only so much Cromwell could do. In the end the manor sell off was not allowed to take place but Margaret did manage to secure a £40 a year pension for herself.

The closure of Little Marlow happened over several months. First the king's men came to assess whether any nuns aged under 24 were present and if so to declare them no longer nuns. The state didn't want young people starting out in the cloistered life. Margaret had 3 such women and the day they were ordered out she lost most of her community. A few months later the priory was shut entirely and Margaret and her last remaining colleague left. Four servants and a priest lost their places along with the nuns.

Before the Dissolution Henry 8th happily allowed the persecution of the growing number of Protestants in the country who were challenging Catholic beliefs. Marlow did not escape these persecutions. At some point between 1518 and 1521 John Gardiner of Marlow reported his own sister Agnes, by marriage Agnes Ward, also of Marlow for blasphemous (as in Protestant) beliefs. He also pointed the finger at a slew of other Marlovians at the same time, including Reynold Shirwood we heard of earlier in this post. There were clearly other snitches and spies about- poor John "Simonnds" and his wife (probably the same woman as Mrs John "Simon" above) were on a separate occasion charged with having a book of the Gospels written in English. This was a great crime as it implied you were exploring your faith yourself rather than relying on the interpretation from Latin of your approved local priest. Another time John and Isabel Gardiner of Marlow -the same John?- had to be forced to swear to the fact that they had heard Thomas Rave (perhaps Reeve) of Marlow say that pilgrimages were worthless and chapels dedicated to the saints pointless. Rave was already in trouble having been ordered to go to the Bishop of Lincoln to do penance for an unknown religious offence. Whilst in Lincoln he disrupted mass and was clearly unrepentant. The Bishop got rid of him to finish his penance in High Wycombe, unsuccessfully. The fate of the other accused Marlovians is not known to me.

Both Margaret and Reynold Shirwood, and other 1500s residents asked to be buried in the churchyard of Marlow. Burial inside the church itself required deep pockets. The Shirwoods could have afforded it but some people thought expensive memorials an example of sinful pride so would not ask for them regardless. Outside graves were not typically permanently marked in this era. 

Written and researched by Charlotte Day.

©Marlow Ancestors.


Selected Sources=

The Urban Experience: A Sourcebook : English, Scottish, and Welsh Towns, 1450-1700. Kiribati, Manchester University Press, 1983.

Copy of returns of vintners, innkeepers and alehousekeepers 1577 Bucks Archives ref=

D-X423/1 bucks archives

The Cottage Homes of England by Helen Allingham and Stewart D-ck 1909 published by Edward Arnold, London (population increase).

The Holinshed Chronicles of England, Scotland and Ireland Volume 1, compiled by Raphael Hollinshed for the Stationers Company, 1577, London.

History and Topography of Buckinghamshire by James Joseph Sheahan, published by Longman, Green, Longman and Roberts, 1862.

Many wills including those of Thomas Bevington, Reynold Shirwood, Margaret Shirwood, David Shirwood, Robert Sands. All are at the National Archives.

The Acts and Monuments of John Foxe by John Foxe, revised edition published by Seeley's of London 1856.

Home Counties Magazine article by Miss E.M Walford  (quoting bridge land property records from 1617) https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Home_Counties_Magazine.html?id=_HIaAQAAIAAJ#v=onepage&q=Marlow%20%22high%20street%22&f=false 1899 published by F.E Robinson. Volume one.

Records of Buckinghamshire Volume 5 compiled by James Pickburn 1878 for Buckinghamshire Architectural and Archaeological Society, Aylesbury. Via Google Books. 

Peter Russell of Marlow apprenticeship https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/C5522927

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugh_of_Lincoln

Account of the Nunnery of Little Marlow by Walter De Gray Birch, published in Records Of Buckinghamshire Volume 4, 1871. Via the Archaeology Data Service https://archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/library/browse/details.xhtml?recordId=3254649&recordType=Journal

Reading and Writing during the Dissolution: Monks, Friars and Nuns  1530-58 by Mary C. Earlier. Published by Cambridge University Press, 2013.

Memorials of the Danvers Family (of Dauntsey and Culworth) by Francis Nottidge Macnamara published by Hardy and Page 1895, London. Via Google Books.

Historic England record for Little Marlow Priory https://archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/archsearch/record?titleId=1036080

Lovelace vs unknown Six Clerks Office National Archives ref=

C 1/1306/53


Sunday, May 25, 2025

Will of Grace Church of Medmenham 1776



Will both written and proven 1776.

Spinster.

Says she sick and weak of body but of sound and perfect mind, memory and understanding.

To "my young brother" Mark Church a ring in remembrance.

To niece Martha Gray my bed, bedding, linen, clothes, wearing apparel and anything belonging to them.

To James Moss of Walworth in the county of Surrey bricklayer all ready money, any stock in funds, securities and any other personal estate left after debts and funeral expenses paid. James is made executor of the will.

Grace signed with a mark.

Witnesses: Henry Allnutt of Great Marlow attorney and William Bitmead.

This will summary was created from Charlotte Day's transcription of the original P.C.C will held at the National Archives Kew.

Grace's father Thomas a farmer of Medmenham and her mother Mary died in rapid succession of each other in 1770. Mary's will is on the blog here.

We focus on Marlow but try to include some surrounding area content. Over 100 will summaries are available on this blog. See the Will Transcriptions Index. More Medmenham related posts are indexed here.

©Marlow Ancestors. You are very welcome to use my research for family or local history purposes with credit to this blog.

Thursday, January 2, 2025

Will of Elizabeth Lambe 1731

 Will of Elizabeth Lambe of Great Marlow. Written 1728, proved 1731.

 Says she is writing will because of the uncertainty of this transitory life.

Commends soul to God and hopes for pardon and remission for her sins.

Debts and funeral charges to be paid by her own executor. She to be decently interred.

To Mrs Susan Cooke a ...gown.....(several indecipherable words)

To Mr John Cooke four silver (medals?) and two pairs.....

To Mr Thomas Stanton a gold ...ring.

To Mrs Cordelia Stanton a gold locket.

To Mrs Dority [spelling reflects the common pronunciation of the name Dorothy at this time] Ward a green emerald ring with two diamonds.

To Mrs Dority Cavalier a mother of pearl snuff box bound with silver.

To Mr Peeter Pagett a silver snuff box.

To my brother....Bot... £5 and to Debora his wife £5, my wedding ring and a black cloth gown.

To John Rogers and Thomas Rogers my nephews £10 apiece.

To Richard, Robert and Debora (Dirks?) my cousins £5 apiece.

To Grace (Dirks?) a black silk gown.

To my sister Mary (Borch? Booth?) a black  gown and to her husband a silver spoon.

To Mrs Dority Horniman an ash coloured suit of silk and a quilted petticoat of red and green. In case the Ship "Mediterranean" in which the said suit and petticoat goes should miscarry the executor to make good the loss by way of a quantity of silk. [As becomes clear later in the will the testator is writing her will onboard a ship].

To Mr William M... £10.

I give mourning rings to Reverend Mr Benjamin Crow, to Mr William Gray, Mr Thomas Blackwell, Mr Thomas ...., Mr David Cannon, Mr Ch..g merchant at..., Mr John ..an, Mr John Row, Mr Robert Cartwright and his wife Mrs Mary Cartwright, Mr... my nephew and to his wife, each of the three sister of Mr (Mins?) in Bishopgate Street [presumably the street in London], Mr John Newton distiller and to his wife, Mr Thomas Buttler, Mr Cavalier of ...ghouse, to Captain Brown and to his wife, to Captain..., Mr Chamberlain Godfrey.

To Captain John Hark at my safe arrival at Legh... £10.

All else of personal estate to loving niece Anne Rogers who is also made executor of the will.

Witnessed by Richard Sh... and William May.

***

Questions may have arisen over the will as Elizabeth had made a mistake. Mr William May and Debora Rogers both of London appeared to give sworn statements as to being familiar with the testator and her wishes. William said that Elizabeth Lambe was late of Great Marlow, formerly of London and also of an illegible place in Italy. He was a fellow passenger on a merchant ship carrying Elizabeth from Legh...to England in April 1728 when and also took lodgings opposite her own lodgings when they arrived in London. There they both lived for several months.  She asked him to come and help her with her will in October 1728 [presumably ahead of her return voyage from London to Leigh...]. At the time Elizabeth indicated that she had forgotten the first name of the niece Rogers that she wanted to execute her will (!!!!). It was either Anne or Debora she thought but didn't think it mattered if the will got it wrong. Elizabeth was dictating the document to William and as she said it wasn't important that he rendered the name correctly he plumped for naming the executor as "Anne Rogers". Some time later he was once more a fellow passenger on the "Mediterranean" ship with Elizabeth and also her niece - Debora Rogers as it transpired not Anne! During the voyage Elizabeth indicated to him that this was the niece she intended to be the executor and main beneficiary of the will. This niece Debora he brought to the probate hearing. The court accepted this and Debora was allowed to execute the will. 

Hopefully she used some of her inheritance to get a nice big pendant with her name on to hang about her neck in case other relatives of hers were similarly vague as to her identity.


This p.c.c will transcribed from the original held at the National Archives, Kew and then summarized by me Charlotte Day.

Many other will transcriptions are on this blog, see the Wills Index.

©Marlow Ancestors. You are welcome to use my transcription summary with credit to this blog.


Monday, October 9, 2023

Forty Green Assessment 1833

 Compiled Autumn 1833 for use in 1834 for tax calculations. Those listed are heads of household who occupied residential property. They may or may not have actually owned the property. Farm land is not included in this part of the assessment. I have transcribed the information below from the assessor's original working notebooks used to compile the assessment. The amount listed for each property is the estimated annual rental value of the property.

Forty Green

Each occupying a cottage and garden with an annual value of £3 10 shillings:

Charles Swadling (see below for another of this name too)

Abraham Gray

William Pope

*****

Cottage and garden with £4 annual value:

Joseph Heath

*****

Cottage and garden with £3 annual value:

Charles Swadling 

All references to any individual on this blog can be found on the A-Z Person Index in the top drop down menu. Thousands are mentioned. Other parts of the assessment can be found by searching for a street of interest here and for outlying areas by searching here

Transcribed by Charlotte Day.

©Marlow Ancestors. You are welcome to use this information for family or local history purposes with credit to this blog.

Tuesday, June 28, 2022

The graves of faithful Clayton servants - Trent, Bennett, Boyle, Robinson, Gray



 Above two, the substantial grave of Elizabeth Boyle erected by her emoloyer Sir William Robert Clayton. 

In memoriam of Elizabeth Boyle, d. Mar 29th 1844

Age 6? years. 

"Nearly 20 years ....proved herself a faithful and (attached?) housekeeper to Sir William Robert Clayton Bart, who enscribes this stone in memorial to the strict integrity and ....fidelity with which she ..  ably perform the duties of her situation"



Above, A faithful and honest servant, above, Ann Trent, 8 years in the service of General Sir William Robert Clayton, Bart. D. Monday, Feb 1? 1858 age 50 years. Stone erected in token of her "strict integrity." 




ABOVE, Sir William Robert Claytons faithful and honest servant Mrs Sarah Bennett, d June 24 18?? age 56. Stone also erected in honour of her "strict integrity"




Hard to decipher grave of Thomas Robinson, servant to Lieut. General Sir William Robert Clayton during military service.  In honour of a "brave soldier and good servant"



Above, grave of Sarah Gray Died May 17th 18(17?) At Harleyford for (25?) years. Erected by "her attached master"  Sir William Robert Clayton, Bart in honour of her exemplary fidelity and honesty  and excellent character. 


In 1827, the funeral of another Clayton servant was reported across the country. The unnamed servant had spent 45 years in service to the family and the funeral was attended by 14 male servants of Harleyford, with a combined 771 years of age between them (and a total of 461 years of service to the Clayton's between them)

One - J Beavor - aged 92 had spent 77 years there. 


More Information:

To find every mention of an individual or family here use the A-Z person index in the top drop down menu.

Grave/memorial image index here

Posts related to Harleyford here


Sources

John Ball 16 Apr 1827 - copy held in the British Library and accessed via the BNA

Lancaster Gazette, 21 Apr 1827, as above.

Bells Weekly Messenger, 16 Apr 1827, as above. 

Windsor and Eton Express  14 April 1827

©Marlow Ancestors. Reproduction welcome with credit.


Tuesday, June 21, 2022

Will of Edmund Stone 1709

 Will of Edmund Stone, mercer of Great Marlow. Written 1705 with a codicil 1706. Proved 1709.

A very long and complex will with plentiful crossings out.

Commits soul to God.

Asks to be buried at Cookham with his family.

Appoints for the period of 12 years two of his friends as trustees for property that is to go afterwards to his grandson. Edmund Stone Austin. Friends are Jonathan Hammond of Great Marlow and John Lee of Cookham. If Edmund Stone Austin has no sons then property to his brother Valentine Stone Austin. If Valentine has no sons then property to his brother John Austin. If John has no sons then property to testator's daughter Elizabeth Austin and her heirs male.

Property involved is:

9 acres of meadow in Bray Meade and Wickets Meade in Bray Berkshire.

Close nearest ....Pond called Long Leys.

Messuage or tenement with appurtenances and 2 acres arable Braywick, side nearest Long Lane.

6 messages or tenements and appurtenances in Maidenhead, Berkshire.

Messuage or tenement with appurtenances at North Towne with 2 and a half acres lying dispersed in Cookham Field.

My message or farm with all its closes, land, meadow, pasture and woods in Wooburn Buckinghamshire.

All other messuages he may have.

Son Nathaniel Austin owes testator £200 in bonds for which little interest has been paid. In turn testator owes Nathaniel a £500 mortgage on the above property with 2.5 acres in North Towne. This property was bought in the name of the testators daughter because at the time it was a "troublesome" period for Protestant Dissenters. Though in her name the family understood that it was really the testator's property. Nathaniel has various goods at his house which belong to testator. These are to be sold and the money put towards paying off the £500 mortgage. Nathaniel is the preferred chapman to handle the sale. If he wants to buy the goods himself at full value he can. The rent for that property is to be paid to the trustees. They can ask for it to be given over for sale by them at any time.

Out of all the property wife Dorothy gets an annuity of £20 paid in quarterly installments for the 12 years the properties are under the trustees. Rest of income is to be put out in such way as to get interest. Once Dorothy has her annuity, and enough is raised to pay off the £500 mortgage, £100 is to raised from the property so it can be given as a lump sum to Edmund Stone Austin at 21. If he dies before that money descends to Valentine Austin, or if not to John Austin or to the daughters of testator's daughter or to other heirs of daughter Elizabeth herself in that order of precedence. 

Trustees 1 guinea each. They to reimburse themselves the expense of keeping the properties in good repair.

Household goods in my dwelling house to wife Dorothy for life.

All residual property to wife Dorothy who is made executor.

Witnesses John Welles, Mary Welles and Robert Peck.

Codicil 1706:

Jonathon Hammond and John Lee removed as trustees and testator's friend Nathaniel Micklem the elder and his brother in law Richard Gray also of Hurley made trustees instead.

The profits of his property now to go to his wife Dorothy for the first 6 years of the trusteeship.

Grandson Valentine now gets £100 at 21 too. If he dies before that it to go to his brother Edmund or if not to his brother John .

Transcribed and then summarized  from a PCC will held at the National Archives Kew.

All mentions of any individual on this blog can be found on the Person Index. This included over 4,000 people.


Index to other Great and Little Marlow wills here: here

©Marlow Ancestors. You are welcome to use this transcription summary for family or local history purposes if you credit this blog.


Sunday, May 1, 2022

David Millard Will (Brief!) and Notes

 David Millard, yeoman. Written 1825. Proved 1831. See note below.

Everything to wife Sarah including the property they live in [testator's estate not detailed any further]. 

Sarah sole executor.

Witnessed by George Cole and George Daniels.

Will transcribed and summarised by Charlotte Day. You can obtain a copy of this PCC will from the National Archives.

Notes: There must have been some delay in proving the will as David was buried in Marlow aged 56 in 1826. He had married Sarah Gray at Marlow in 1791. He was baptised at Bisham in 1769 the son of James and Winifred.

David had Sarah had the following children:

Ann 1791 (buried 1793)

Ann 1794

Mary Ann 1796

Jane 1799 (buried 1810)

Elizabeth 1802

James 1806

David 1809 (buried 1810)

There does not look to be a remarriage or burial for Sarah at Marlow.

Will witness George Daniels was a cabinet maker who lived Chapel Street. George Cole ran a school in Chapel Street. A biographical post on him will be published in the future.

©Marlow Ancestors. You are welcome to use this content for family or local history purposes with credit to this blog.


Tuesday, April 19, 2022

1833 Parochial Assessment Lane End & Ditchfield Part 2


As Lane End was part of the parish of Great Marlow in Buckinghamshire it is covered by my original 1833 parochial assessment working notebooks of the assessors and related correspondence for that parish, which are held by my family. These were the original notes used to compile the tax assessment for 1834. Pencilled in corrections and additions were added in to the notebooks up to circa 1839. I will add any of those in below and highlight them as such.

©Marlow Ancestors. Freely use quotes from this transcription for family or local history purposes if you credit this blog.

Format:

Name of occupier

Description of property occupied

Assessed annual value of that property

Any notes by me in square brackets.



James Goldswain

Cottage and part of yard

£4

*****

Michael Lewis

House, yard, stable and garden

£7

*****

John Tilby

Cottage

£3

*****

Richard Hansell [name corrected in pencil from original Hasell]

Cottage, yard and woodhouse

£4 10 shillings

*****

Charles Tilby

Cottage and woodhouse

£4

*****

Thomas Goldswain

Cottage and woodhouse

£4

Garden at the common

£1

*****

Ellis Styles

House, bakehouse, yard, shed and garden

£10

Stable and piggery

£1

*****

Henry Goldswain

House, garden and piggery

£6

*****

James Seares

Cottage and garden

£4

Garden on the common

10 shillings

*****

James Bowers [name later replaced with pencilled name Harries]

Cottage and garden

£4

*****

John Seares [He was a potter. Later correction in pencil: name Harries in place of Seares]

House, stable and garden

£5

Old Kiln and two pieces of garden [pencilled note that changed name to Harries also corrected value of kiln to £1 and crossed out the gardens]

£2 10 shillings

*****

Pot kiln, yard, drying house and working house

£5

Cottage and woodhouse

£4 10 shillings

*****

William Gray

Cottage and Woodhouse

£4 10 shillings

******

Thomas Gray

Cottage and garden

£4 10 shillings

*****

James Webb

Cottage

£4

Garden on the common

15 shillings

*****

Thomas Arnold

Cottage and garden

£4 10 shillings

Garden opposite

10 shillings

*****

Richard Oxlade

Garden on the common

5 shillings

*****

Thomas Plummer

The Old Sun house [pub], stable, yard and gardens

£9

Orchard and skittle ground

£1 10 shilings

*****

William Carr

Cottage

£2 10 shillings

*****

Widow Wakefield

Cottage

£2

*****

Each occupying a new cottage and garden belonging to W Jarvis with an annual value each of £5 10 shillings

John Sharp

Thomas Barlow

William Grey

Richard Brazier

*****

James Jarvis

House, garden, yard, sheds, 2 large shops and lofts, stables and boiling house

£20

*****

James Hardell

House and large garden

£5 10 shillings

*****

Thomas Smith

Cottage and part of garden

£5

Garden on the common

10 shillings

*****

Richard Brown

House, woodhouse and large garden

£7 10 shillings

*****

Jonathan Plumridge

House and garden

£6

*****

Joseph Townsend

2 gardens on common

£1 10 shillings

*****

Richard Hatch

House, stables, chaisehouse, piggery, woodhouse, garden, meadow and orchard

£20

Cottage and garden

£4

*****

William Lewis

Cottage and garden

£4

*****

Zachariah Blick

House, garden, another garden on the common and 2 woodhouses

£7

*****

Daniel Block

Garden on the common

£1

*****

Joseph Coleman

Shop and a garden on the common £2

*****

James Saunders

House and garden

£5 10 shillings

*****

Richard Brown

Cottage and garden

£4 10 shillings

*****

James Insden

Cottage and garden

£3 10 shillings

*****

Meaks [no first name, note added later "Ditchfield"]


Half of shop and part of garden

10 shillings

*****

John Wakelin

Part of garden Ditchfield

5 shillings

*****

Mary White 

Part of garden Ditchfield

5 shillings

*****

Richard Stallwood

Part of garden and stye Ditchfield

5 shillings

*****

Henry Oxlade

Part of garden and stye Ditchfield

5 shillings

*****

Charles Tilby

Part of garden and stye Ditchfield

5 shillings 

*****

James Martin

Cottage and two gardens Ditchfield

£4 10 shillings

*****

John Carr

Cottage and garden Ditchfield

£4 10 shillings

*****

Joseph Dormer

Cottage and garden Ditchfield

£4 10 shillings

*****

Widow Oxlade

Part of garden

7 shillings

*****

Martin Lovelock [name in pencil added later Stockwell]

Part of garden

15 shillings

*****

Thomas Lovelock

Part of Orchard and garden

7 shillings

*****

George Sears

Cottage and large garden  [later pencil note corrects to "now 4 cottages"]

£2 10 shillings

*****

John Biggs

Shed, small garden, shed [yes shed written twice], large wood yard, drying shed, tile yard, 6 drying sheds, pavement house and kiln yard

£9

*****

John Stevens

Long garden

£1

*****

Joseph Silver

Part of large garden

5 shillings

*****

William Cooper and Edward Taylor

Part of large  garden in joint occupation

10 shillings

*****

Chapman [no first name, later name correction in pencil John Saunders]

Cottage and garden

£4 10 shillings

*****

Edward Wise

Cottage and garden

£4

*****

Powell the Keeper [probably for either toll gate or gate of Seymour Court House]

Cottage, sheds and garden

£5

*****

John East 

Cottage and garden

£4

*****

No name

Seymour Court House Mansion [this more in Great Marlow proper really], stables, yard, coach houses, shrubbery and walks, kitchen garden, 3 orchards and wilderness [!]

£30

*****

The End.

Look at Other Places on the top drop menu for more Lane End content.

The Person Index lists every mention of any individual on this blog.
















Wednesday, April 13, 2022

1833 Parochial Assessment Lane End Part One

 As Lane End was part of the parish of Great Marlow in Buckinghamshire it is covered by my original 1833 parochial assessment notebooks for that parish, which are held by my family. These were the working notebooks used by the assessors to compile the local tax assessment for 1834. My notebooks also contain additions and corrections for several years afterwards and scrap related correspondence related to the assessment.

©Marlow Ancestors. Freely use quotes from this transcription for family or local history purposes if you credit this blog.

Any notes by me are in square brackets.

Corrections and amendments to the original notes seems to have been done in the notebook up to circa 1839 and will be noted in my transcription too if they occur in these parts of the assessment.


Charles Fletcher

Property occupied:

Crown Inn house, garden, "etc"

Annual value of property: £9 10 shillings

Also occupies:

Shoemaker's shop

£2

Small orchard

£1

Orchard by Marks 

£3

*****

William Jarvis

House and garden

£5

*****

William Collins

Cottage and garden

£4

Meeting House [note added in brackets afterwards "if rated"]

£7

*****

Jeremiah Almond

Cottage

£3

*****

William Catton

Yard, barn, shop, sheds and garden

£6

House and garden

£6

Orchard, stable and shed

£4

Small garden

10 shillings

*****

James Bird

Cottage and garden

£4 10 shillings

*****

Thomas Hackstraw

Cottage and garden [pencil note added later: " part of garden"].

£3 10 Shillings

*****

Thomas Marks

Beer shop house, yard, stable [pencil brackets later put around the word stable] and garden

£7

*****

?Ramsey [no first name, last hard to read could be Ramey, even Rancey. Later the name "Denham" added in pencil without Ramsey name being crossed out]

Cottage and garden

£3

*****

Joseph Lovegrove

House, yard, stable, carthouse, sheds and garden

£10

*****

Edward Tundall

House and garden

£5

*****

William Janes

House, yard and garden

£5

*****

William Lee

Cottage and garden

£3

*****

Widow Biggs

Cottage and garden

£3

*****

Thomas White

Cottage and garden

£4 10 shillings

******

Joseph Dean

Cottage and garden

£3

*****

Samuel Harris

Cottage and garden

£3

*****

Henry Gray

Cottage, garden and stable

£5

*****

Martha Bateman

Cottage and part of yard

£3

****

To be continued..

Look at Nearby Places on the menu for more Lane End content.

The Person Index lists every mention of any individual on this blog. Find it in the top drop down menu.

















Friday, February 18, 2022

The Limes, Glade Road

The house immediately after the Baptist Chapel in Glade Road, if walking away from the railway station. On the side of the building a large "built 1884" plaque is unmistakable so it was erected the same year as the Baptist Chapel. A house on the other side of the road now called "Lime House" [number 1] is not the historic "The Limes".

Historic occupiers I can identify:

1890-91 John and Mrs Lily Mentor. John's tragic death by suicide is examined in Kathryn's post here.

1896 as summer renters and 1897-99 as actual residents= Conrad Dressler, sculptor and potter and his wife. Conrad was a member of the Arts and Crafts Exhibitor's Society. He operated later from Medmenham Pottery at Marlow Common. Conrad and his wife moved to live nearer to it at Bovingdon Green. To read about trouble Conrad got into see " Artists In Marlow History" here and a full post about his pottery at Marlow Common here

1899 - Mrs Greenwood. 

1900= house is again a seasonal holiday let.

1908= Alice and Henry Gray. This couple skipped about a bit in Glade Road, occupying various properties. Henry bought Clifton's stores grocery and off licence shop in the High Street early in 1902. This was on the corner of Institute Road. He had previously been manager of a similar shop in Staines but was of Marlow birth. His brother James was a mortgage broker / insurance agent based in the Old Vicarage in the High Street who soon came into the grocery business with Henry too.

1911-24 Mrs Moore.

Our blog focuses on Pre 1930s Marlow People.

©Marlow Ancestors. You are very welcome to use this content for family or local history purposes if you credit this blog and link here.

Sources Included:

Mapping the practice of sculpture in Britain and Ireland 1851-1951. University of Glasgow and HATII. http://sculpture.gla.ac.uk .Accessed 23rd October 2021.

South Bucks Standard 17th April 1891 and 22nd May 1896. British Library Archives copies.

Kelly's Directory of Bucks 1911 and 1924. Kelly's Directories Limited.







Thursday, January 20, 2022

John Adams Toy Seller And Fancy Goods Man


West Street was a good place to go if you were a little boy or girl clutching a spare coin or two in the Victorian and Edwardian era. It was a street never without a toy retailer. Mr Salier, Hannah Blizzard and the Norths are three toys sellers that come to mind but the subject of today's post is John Adams. 

John was born in Westminister c1827. He arrived in Marlow when he was about 20 years old, on foot, seeking work. He called at cabinet maker Mr Mealing in the High Street. In this he was lucky. He gained a job there, first as a furniture polisher and then as a cabinet maker. But like so many early Victorians John had his finger in many pies, and some ventures went a little more smoothly than others! 


 

Above, the Mealing first workshop and  showroom premises where John initially worked. The Mealing business premises moved very slightly further down the High Street a little while later.


A difficulty of another kind hit John when he fell in love with Sarah Maria Gudgin soon after settling here. Sarah accepted his proposal but her family certainly did not. They considered John an unsuitable match - her family were better off than his for one thing. The couple eloped to London to marry at St Pancras in February 1851. But although the couple had taken out a marriage licence, the priest refused to marry them. It seems this was because they had lied and claimed they were both resident in the parish where the marriage was to take place and the priest knew this not to be so. But the marriage proceeded the following day with the bride's residence corrected to Marlow. This was St Valentines day by a sweet coincidence. How the families "strong opposition" to the couples union broke down after the fact of their marriage isn't clear. But John and Sarah made their home in Marlow and lived here until the end of their lives. 


The exact date of John starting out in business on his own account isn't clear. He was still working for Mr Mealing at the time of his marriage and defined himself as a cabinet maker in some sources even after the first mention of his "toy warehouse" can be found in 1854. Combining sources of income was standard for small shopkeepers at this time in Marlow, the wives usually managing the day to do day shop work. John's obituary mentioned that he had first taken over a small West Street stationers and newsagent and expanded into the neighbouring premises to offer toys and confectionary. These two little shops were in the building currently occupied by the main Sainsburys supermarket. John's toy shop was certainly different from one today - it sold tobacco in that side of the business! Later it also squeezed in some groceries. 


John comes across as a man who always had his eye on a new business or money making opportunity. He is said to have suffered heavy losses on the racetrack, and by unsuccessfully speculating on gold mines. For a while he had a second shop, in the "best part of the High Street", which was a fancy goods repository. What a fancy goods seller offered varied by shop and over time, but in John's case, he sold fancy clothes trimmings and accessories such as braiding and silks, embroidery supplies, costume jewellery, ivory, pearl and tortoiseshell brushes and combs, as well as robes and "oriental goods". And confectionary of course. He combined this with a coal selling sideline, another common Marlow side income. A fire in his warehouse in 1866 saw the building left with just the walls standing.  Luckily John was insured for this loss. In 1869 John offered both the fancy goods business and coal merchant part up for sale as he was "declining" coal selling. But it seems there were no takers. In 1872 John was at least creating the impression that the fancy goods business was doing well. He advertised that he was going to invest in a grand redecoration of his premises. This would involve a big stock sale to create room. But a second notice, saying the clearance would be effected by selling everything at 20% below cost price does sound like the work of a man either extremely eager to begin his decorating, or one with a cash flow problem. Sure enough, less than a year later, John was trying without success to sell his fancy goods business again. Unfortunately the stock in trade and shop fittings were then auctioned off on the premises to appease his creditors and stave off bankruptcy.  It was then back to concentrating on the West Street business. Not to be defeated, John gained a licence to sell British wines there in 1873. He was known for his low prices, and seems to have flourished again. He was constantly improving the two premises, and they became known as a bazaar which probably suits the eclectic range of novelties to be found inside. Some of the fancy goods element had found its way back in by the time Sarah Adams died aged 64 in 1894. 


Around the time of his wife's death, John decided to split his West Street shop back into 2. He would continue with the newsagent side, and unmarried relative Hannah Blizzard would take over the toys and fancy goods element in the neighbouring premises. A few years later Hannah would suffer a horrible death when her apron and then the rest of her clothes caught alight as she cooked potatoes for her dinner on a little stove. Hannah's niece Ruth North would later take it over - read about her here.


John himself lived alone behind the shop after his wife passed away. In 1897 he too died at home, thankfully more peacefully than the tragic Hannah. In the 10 days before his death, he had begun to have his meals at the adjacent toy shop, provided by niece Elizabeth Blizzard. One day he did not come for his tea. Elizabeth knocked at the shop to tell him it was ready but received no answer. Believing him to be out, she though no more of it until he also failed to call for breakfast. She ran to the High Street to fetch John's nephew James Gray who broke in through the back door. They found John dead in his fireside chair, a newspaper folded on the table alongside his customary jug of beer bought from the neighbouring Sadlers Arms. It was decided he had died peacefully of heart failure during an afternoon nap. His shop was subsequently used again with it's neighbour as part of the North's toy shop. 

Note: there was another man in West Street, in the 1890s and early 1900s with the name John Adams. This other John was younger and a domestic coachman /publican.


Written and researched by Kathryn Day. 

More about the Meaning family, furniture makers to royalty see Charlotte's post here

 Use the A-Z people index at the top to find every mention of an individual here, and the Specific Shops, Streets etc option to find other entries relating to shops or West Street. Thousands of people are featured on this blog.

 For posts about everyday life in Marlow in the past, see the post listing here

 Happy hunting! 

©Marlow Ancestors. You are welcome to use this post for family or local history purposes if you credit this blog and link here.


Sources include: 


1854, 1869 & 1883 Post Office Directory (Kelly's Directories Ltd)

1876 Harrods Royal and County Directory (Harrod & co)

Marriage Licence research by Charlotte Day

GRO Birth, Marriage and Death index

1851, 1871, 1881, 1891 census transcriptions from microfilm by Charlotte Day

1905 Marlow Guide

South Bucks Standard 22 Jan 1897, British Library Archive, accessed via the BNA. 

1872 sale of stock notice, John Adams. 

Bucks Herald 13 September 1873 as above. 

Reading Mercury 3 July 1869, Maidenhead Advertiser 27 January 1897, as above. 

Bucks Free Press June 5th 1896, Bucks Free Press Archives.






Saturday, October 23, 2021

Gray Grave, Cemetery, Marlow

 



Yes, the grave is listing a little!


Letters carved above are C and HG on other side. 

Inscription below - Vera Gray. 1890 to 1945. 

For similar posts see Graves on the menu. See also Person Index and Will Transcriptions.

©Marlow Ancestors. Reproduction freely permitted with credit.


Thursday, September 30, 2021

Congregational Church Grave Ann GRAY


 Ann Gray who died December 17? 1895 age 68 
And :

Harry Birdseye Gray son of James and Sarah Gray, died October 13th 1910  age 14 and 3/4. (Below)




©MarlowAncestors. Reproduction welcome if you credit this blog and link back here.

Tuesday, August 3, 2021

1700s Chapel Street People

Updated May 2024

I glean every possible will and property record to gather the names of those who lived in Chapel Street, often called Chapel End, in the 1700s. The date next to each name is the date I find reference to them in Chapel Street but they may have been there earlier and later too. This post focuses on the occupiers rather than the owners of property. In most cases in the 1700s the two were not the same thing. The precise buildings cannot usually be identified but I am working on it! Getting the names of any occupiers at all is an enormous task.

I likely have more people to add once I have sifted through my mountain of research notes and will update this post as I can.

Note: the boundary of Chapel Street and Spittal Street was very fluid so some properties in Chapel Street can appear in records as being in Spittal Street and vice versa. It was not uncommon in the 1700s and earlier for Spittal Street to be entirely ignored as a street address and for all properties there to be described as Chapel Street or Chapel End even down as far as the Market Square end.


William Baker, a grocer. Occupier 1797. Unknown if owner. On the site of a shop used as a grocers for over 100 years previously to that. I am trying to identify more precisely which property this was. 

Francis Beck. Tenant of a cottage 1742.

James Bird. Tenant. 

Robert Bristow / Bristowe. Tenant of a cottage South side 1791.

Edward Broadway. Tenant 1782.

Martha Camden [nee White] 1795. Her mother Amy White below part owned this property. Who owned other part/s unknown. Sister of Jane White below.

John Collins tenant of a cottage 1798.  

Mark Cutter. Tenant 1743 of a cottage. In 1733 the same cottage had been in the occupation of John Phillips.

Thomas Davison. Occupier North side 1710.

Widow Eagle. Tenant, Chapel End 1795.

George and Ann Faux. Alias Fox. George was a schoolmaster who had his own private boarding school. Resident 1750s- death 1797. Prospect House which was often given as Chapel End in the 1700s but was really in Glade Road near the corner with Little Marlow Road (a continuation of Chapel Street). Wife Ann. After their time there the school moved to the end of Wycombe Road and then to Marlow Place. 

James & Anthony Field, 1786 - drapers*

Widow ?Gray? 1730. Not the owner of the property she occupied.

John Hammerton. Owner of house there in his will 1716. Basket Maker. Wife Jane inherited life interest in the property then it went to their son.

Thomas Hester. Occupier 1748.

Robert Howard. Occupier North side 1745, East of the White Hart. This may be Robert Howard junior son of Robert Howard senior of Bisham. That Robert junior inherited two cottages in Chapel Street in the will of his father proved in 1744, though these were only to come to him after the death of his mother. The two cottages in that will were the ones mentioned in this post as occupied by William Hubbard and Francis Beck.

William Hubbard. Tenant of a cottage 1742.

Thomas Langley. Owner and occupier 1723. A sawyer.

John Lawes tenant, Chapel End 1760 and 1798. This may not be the same property on both occasions and it is possible given the 38 year gap in dates that the earlier John Lawes is the father or uncle etc of the later John Lawes rather than the same man. His premises were previously occupied by Joseph Loveless and Thomas and Mary Sears. See below. Note Added September 2021: this property was actually in Spittal Street, though described as Chapel End. As I said above there was no consistency when describing properties in these two streets which run into each other.

Joseph Loveless alias Lovelace. Appropriately given that name he was a "laceman". Tenant of a house 1754, which had previously been occupied by Thomas Sears whose business he had bought. Probably but not definitely North side. Property later occupied by John Lawes. Note added September 2021: this property was actually in Spittal Street which as I explained above was routinely described as being part of Chapel Street in the past. The two roads run into each other.

Robert Menday. Tenant of White Hart, North side of the street 1732. A Mr Menday was running the pub in 1745 which may also be Robert.

John Phillips. 1733. Not owner. By 1743 his cottage was occupied by Mark Cutter above.

Mary and Thomas Sears. He was a lace maker. Occupier 1748. Unknown if owner. Home and business premises in one. Mary was a widow and occupier of the property alone in 1751. She was no longer resident there in 1754. Joseph Loveless alias Lovelace had bought her husband's business and taken over occupation of the Sears' premises. By 1760 the occupier was John Lawes. See above. Note added September 2021: this property was actually in Spittal Street as we would call it today but little effort was made to distinguish between these two continuous streets in the past.

William Stevens, bargeman. Will proved 1730. Owned his own home.

Thomas Taylor. Occupier North side 1745. 

Richard Tovey. Occupier North side 1710.

Thomas Wal..er. Tenant. Chapel End. 1798. [Walter? Walker?]

Ann and John Warner. Tenants 1788. 

Carter Webb, a cordwainer. Occupier 1748. Unknown if owner. He was no longer resident in the same premises in 1760.

William Weedon. Or possibly Wooden. Tenant of a cottage South side 1791.

Amy White, widow. Owner and occupier of a cottage. 1795. Will proved 1796. Left this property to her daughter Jane White.

Jane White. 1795. Her mother Amy White above part owned this cottage. Who owned the other parts is unknown. Sister of Martha Camden above.

* With big thanks to friend of the blog Linda Green for this information. (London Archives Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance records CLC/B/192/F/001/MS11936/334/515799)

################################

I have previously published a post on the 1700s residents of Quoiting Square here and Dean Street here. High Street 1700s residents are here and Oxford Road here.

My recreated trade directory for 1700s Marlow and Little Marlow is here

Recreated 1600s trade directory Part One and Part_two

Researched and written by Charlotte Day. Additional research by Kathryn Day. 

©Marlow Ancestors. You are very welcome to reuse this research for family or local history purposes with credit to this blog and a link here.


Tuesday, July 6, 2021

The Loss Of Old Marlow Church *UPDATED*

 


The chancel date of 1875 commemorated. 


If a visitor was to stand and look at our current delightful All Saints Church, it's hard to imagine that many would describe it as "a pile of deformity", hideously ugly or unfit for viewing up close. But these are all descriptions chosen by contemporary visitors in the years after the new church opened in 1835. The building as it stood then did however look very different to the current one! A lot of work has gone into changing it's appearance. This post is about some of the reasons why and is also a tribute to the old church it replaced. 


The old Marlow church. 

The "ancient" structure our current church replaced was regarded by many as handsome, and full of historic memorials. In 1801 it's interior was described as "plain and decent" with an ancient stone screen , handsome carved oak altar and a large hand organ in the front gallery dating from 1775.  But those who had to work within it felt the building was showing it's age, with a leaky roof, damp and frequent inundations by flood water making the situation worse. In 1730 the church is described as a long low building consisting of the tower, 3 aisles, two chancels and "on the south west part was a chantry chapel in honour of St Mary". (The chantry was dissolved in 1547 and was still standing in 1730 according to some but then used as a "timber warehouse". More on that will follow.) 


 The wooden spire dating from 1627 needed periodic repainting - it was white in colour - and suffered weather damage fairly often. A workman, 20 year old carpenter William Gray of Cookham Dean, was engaged in doing some of this repainting of the spire in 1791. The pulley he was standing on gave way taking some scaffolding with it and causing him to fall 75ft. He escaped with relatively minor injuries, and no broken bones. This story got embellished a little in later retelling, with some saying he did not receive any injury at all. But poor William did suffer severe bruising of his back and loins and a lacerated right hand and it was originally thought he might have suffered an internal rupture. But 8 days later he was able to walk home from Marlow to Cookham Dean. A black line was painted on the steeple to show the place William fell from and to commemorate his death defying plunge. He was lucky enough to receive an allowance of 7s a week from Lady Le Despencer until such time as he could resume his work.  Another feature of the steeple was the new weather cock erected in 1745. 


Various dates have been given for the steeple and parts of the tower below collapsing, but on going back to the original sources it's clear the two incidents happened separately. The tower had "for some time past been dismantled of its curious steeple" in September 1829, according to a press article complaining about the very slow progress being made with a projected repair (after weather damage). This date is seconded by a separate newspaper which bemoaned the fact the tower had been without it's steeple for 2 weeks in August 1829. The tower had also been "despoiled of its coating" and looked like an emblem of "majesty in distress". Not much progress had been made in December so the church wardens promised to do something to protect the bells over winter. The Reading Mercury thought the tower had been ruined by bad building work and thought it would take an architect of "superior intellect" to sort it all out. A separate storm did more damage in 1830. A cap was put on the tower which was dismissively described as looking like a cucumber frame but yet more poor weather bought this crashing to the ground along with parts of the tower, and the last remains of the steeple framework, in December 1831. Some graves were broken by this fall. 


In decay

In 1826 the church was described as in a state of general decay. The rector and the Dean and Chapter of Gloucester was supposed to maintain the chancel of the church, but they leased out the right to collect the grand tithes and with it the responsibility of doing the repairs. And so little funds were actually given to the church to do any maintenance with. Repairing the church became an election issue with various candidates promising to fix it along with the bridge but no progress was made. 


In 1829, not only was the steeple down, but work was ongoing to build the new Marlow Bridge adjacent. This was a difficult project for all kinds of reasons, which has been covered by a different post which you can read  here.  As part of the work to provide foundations for the bridge, a "chasm" had been opened up beneath the church tower and poor weather saw it fill with water. Some speculated that this pit was damaging the foundations of the church tower. There were sarcastic comments about how much deeper the pit would be made, and the great expense that seemed to be involved in digging it. 


A decision was made that it would be better value for money to knock down all of the old church and build a fine new one that would make a fine companion to the new suspension bridge. There were a lot of arguements about how the new build was to be paid for. Some individuals did make donations towards it's cost and a loan of £7,000 was to be secured on the church rates. But in the end an extra church rate was going to be levied for the next 40 years payable by those also liable for the poor rate whether they attended the church or not. This caused outrage in some quarters. Why couldn't the Dean and Chapter dip into their own coffers for once it was asked. 




Foundations probed

A church committee selected Charles Frederick Inwood as the architect for their new building. A vote was held to consider whether to position it on exactly the same site of the old, or whether to move it a (very) little closer to the High Street. The new site was selected on a 6-5 majority, with the latter option winning. This was not without controversy as it was considered to add needlessly to the cost by some. A couple of thatched "wretched looking hovels" which were located  "in the churchyard"  and a small beer house nearby had to be removed but the Act allowing for the rebuilding of the church had not made provision for the compulsory purchase of these. So the owner held out for a good price. Some asked whether it would be (or should be) lawful for a beer house to be so close to a church. It does seem they were eventually cleared away though. The new site also meant some graves had to be carefully moved, which upset others. 


In October 1831 the site was more or less fixed and tenders were sought for it's construction. William Bond of Marlow won. Later in the month the workmen were probing for a good foundation and in November they began to demolish the old place. The congregation could not continue to worship in a church due for demolition so they met instead at the former workshop of Washbourne's satin stitch manufactory off Quoiting Square/Oxford Road, a place later used for the first Salvation Army Headquarters in the town. They would stay there until June 1835. 


Marlow church is falling down..or is it? 

The problem the old church had with flooding was definite, and a new slightly higher site did improve things even if it was not the means to totally avoid such problems. 


As for the other issues, the demolition of the old church gave plenty of food for thought for those who believed that the church authorities had much exaggerated the supposed dilapidated state of the old building. They were amused by the difficulties involved in demolishing a church that was supposed to be just about ready to fall down of it's own accord. The old "clunch" (hard chalk) building blocks proved hard work to break apart - "it appeared strange that so much apprehension of it's security had been excited". [A group of Marlow residents had petitioned Parliament not to pass the act allowing demolition of the church, at least not until they had closely looked into the buildings reported bad condition and the causes of it - "examine into the Condition of the Said Church, which the petitioners conceive to have been unnecessarily pulled to pieces" It was unsuccessful.] Later rumours were that those involved in the demolition had resorted to the use of gunpowder to complete the work! 


If the church was not so fragile the critics said, there was no reason to begin the building work before funds had been raised to pay for it without resorting to a church rate. But it was too late to complain. Demolition completed, the first stone of the new church was laid by parish clerk Samuel Barnes of St Peter's Street in January 1833. 


As the building progressed, some began to question it's appearance. Architect Inwood had exhibited his plans for the new church at the Royal Academy in 1832 and obviously those originally commissioning the building were happy with them. But it was said that "officious simpletons"  had made adjustments to the original design that ruined it's original beauty. This opinion was given by the Bucks Gazette -  who was very against the Church of England not funding church building from it's own funds. However others stated that Inwood had altered his plans in order to reduce the building cost, which no doubt would have won the approval of many. 


Upset of another kind was caused when the "tackling" used to haul a 15cwt piece of iron to the top of the steeple gave way and the entire load plummeted to the ground, making a hole 6 foot deep in the earth below. It narrowly missed two workman which must have seemed a miracle indeed. The scaffold recieved a good shaking but no injuries resulted. 


The vibrating steeple


Shortly after the church was finished it was noted that the steeple vibrated a great deal "especially when the bells were rung". (See note below.) It was considered that removing the weather vane on top at least temporarily would improve things. So a steeple jack was sent up to remove it watched by a vast crowd. In 1891 it was still noted that the cross on top could be "distinctly seen to rock" when the bells were rung. 


This was only one of many problems recorded. Twelve years after it's construction two glaring issues were raised in the Ecclesiologist magazine. First there was no chancel, despite provision in the Act of Parliament for building the church that it should be maintained at the expense of the rector as before. The other problem was the font was apparently hidden away in a side room in an "unconsecrated" part of the church. They complained the font was not visible from anywhere inside during a service as the door to the room was kept always shut. 


In 1862 more improvements were planned despite the fact the building was only 30 or so years old. It was said that the interior design was full of blunders that made the everyday life of the church difficult. The choir had made frequent complaints that the site allocated to them was not right and hampered how they sounded. So that would be moved and more space would be allowed.  The organ was in the wrong place too and would be put now in the former baptistry. With the pulpit also planned to shift position, it's hard to think of an interior part of the church that everyone was happy with.  


A pile of deformity

But it was the overall appearance of the church that upset many. There were some who were ready to praise it's modern look, even while others decried it's "weak imitation" of 15thc style.  But for the majority of guidebooks and surviving descriptions, the church was ugly, bald of ornament and/or had ruined the once pretty view. Temple Bar magazine, called it "atrociously ugly" in 1862 for example. And those who were responsible for taking down the old church were labelled "ruthless destroyers" by the Bucks Herald. 


One little part of the old church fabric was left in 1862. A hefty stone window was said to be on display in builder Thomas Corby's High Street premises. It's possible some of the other less obviously ecclesiastical materials were recycled and incorporated into other buildings where they may be sitting anonymously today. Alfred Heneage Cocks (the Victorian Marlow gentleman historian, menagerie keeper and bell ringer) was also reported to possess some of the remains of a window.  He had in addition one of two models of the old Church known to exist at that time. Cocks himself reported to the Bucks Archaeological Society of whom he was an active member, that he had recovered numerous bits of moulded stone and marble from the old church. He had them at Thames Bank during his residence there, and on leaving it for Poynetts in 1899, he offered the remains to the churchwardens. This was on condition they were incorporated into the interior of the west end of the church. The churchwardens declined this offer, so Cocks gave them to his aunt Charlotte Cocks who was living at The Glade. He said they were used as a part of a fernery there. Whether they survived is hard to say. There had been complaints that the process of disposing of the old church materials had not been at all transparent with materials sold at low prices to a selected few. 


The church is dilapidated - again

In 1872, the building cost was paid off at last. The Reverend Snaith had bad news to deliver though. He said the church had been neglected for generations (surely a slight exaggeration given it was 40 years old) and now it was in a "dreadful state of dilapidation". The state of the walls and windows was "ruinous" he said. When it rained, the roof leaked so badly that the clergy had to dodge about in order not to get soaked. He said the issues must be dealt with soon and that doing patchwork repairs and improvements would involve much more expense in the end. So a committee was started to raise subscriptions. As well as repairs, a new chancel was at last planned, and much later the wide nave would be divided with arches into 2 aisles. On the 9th September 1875 the foundation stone was laid for the chancel and it was opened on 1 September 1876, with the work costing £1924 and completed by Thomas Corby to the design of John Oldred Scott. 


Other works carried on at various times include bricking up the door that formerly faced the High Street, removing the galleries and box pews, adding new stained glass windows and replacing the flat roof with a pitched design of hand made tiles of "special tint".  And then there was the damage done by the terrible storm of 1897 - a separate post on this is here. Selling off the old pews and gas fittings in 1890 raised £7 for church funds. Even in 1889, when the church was opened after works that included the new roof and new flooring, the bitterness relating to the old church's demise could still be felt. The Bishop of Oxford, preaching on the occasion of this re opening, probably unwittingly touched a still raw nerve in his sermon. He referred to how the old church at Marlow was probably a "strong, large and ancient building which if the possessors of it had taken care in time, would have lasted until now." He added it must therefore have been demolished as it had fallen behind the times as regards convenience. 


The money spent on putting the church right was a large sum and whether it was worth it divided opinion. The book The Royal River in 1885 thought no. Despite Rev Snaith's description of the ruinous state of the church the author thought the apparent sturdy state of the fabric of the building  meant that as no emergency repairs were needed, no further funds should be wasted on it. "It is a question whether it would not have been better to have accepted its ugliness and employed the very large sums which must be expended before the work can be completed to other and more directly useful purposes." Ouch. On the other hand, the South Bucks Standard in 1900 thought that while the church of 1835 had originally been both costly and ugly, the work spent on putting it right was well spent even if had cost a very large amount in it's own right. In 1889 the paper had thought that with the new roof and old pews gone, all the church needed now was to have all of its windows replaced "in a more suitable style", the outer walls refaced in stone and flint, and the west front and steeple recast. Not much work then! 

All Saints is a beautiful church to our modern eyes, both inside and out so if you have not yet visited it, it will repay your time! 



Notes:


 The new bells were rung in the new church in February 1835, some months after the church had re opened. These first bell ringers were honoured on the 60th anniversary of the occasion with a special bell peel in their honour. The ringers were William Truss (later landlord of the Two Brewers), William Smith (tailor of the High Street),  town crier Jeffrey Truss, John Smith (cabinet maker of High Street), Thomas Coster (carpenter and lock keeper), Thomas Rosewell, (fisherman), George Creswell, (Swan landlord, farmer, timber merchant and barge owner)  and Richard Davis (pork butcher and parish constable). 


The Chapel that gave Chapel Street it's name is of uncertain location.  But a possible discovery of part of it was at least previously visible under a house in Spittal Street in the first half of the 20thc. A mention is made of a "crypt" with vaulted ceiling under this house but much pre-dating it, in a passing comment by former Marlow antique dealer Jane Toller in her book "Discovering Antiques". Jane and husband Charles lived at the Old Vicarage in the High Street in the 1930s. The "crypt" was under a front room of the Spittal Street property. It may be (if from the right period at all) associated with the hospital of St Thomas that gave Spittal Street it's name. Another even more likely hint of the chapel remains were seen at the Rookery. It was here in 1877 it was reported that workman digging foundations for the new range of stables had discovered numerous interesting items which were believed to have come from the Hermitage / Chapel. These included some 11th century silver coins, a silver seal, a stone "mantelpiece" and parts of several stone columns.


Written and researched by Kathryn Day. 


Related posts: 

The Angry roaring mist of 1897 here

List of grave images at All Saints and other Marlow area sites here

For more posts like this see Church Related on the menu here

General posts about everyday life in old Marlow here

To find all mentions of an individual here use the A-Z person index in the top drop down. (There are 4,300 people listed there as of July 2022 and new posts are added daily)



SOURCES


Britton, John; Brayley, Edward Westlake et al - Beauties Of England and Wales or, Delineations topographical, historical and descriptive, of each county - (1801)

Cook, William Bernard -  The Thames or graphic illustrations of seats, villas, public institutions" Vol 1. (1827)

Cox, A H - The Church Bells of Buckinghamshire (Jarrold, 1897)

Dugdale, Thomas - Curiosities of Great Britain, England and Wales Delineated (1854)

Hogg, Alexander. The New Ladies Magazine 1791 vol 6. 

Langley, Thomas - The History and Antiquities of the Hundred of Desborough ( Faulkner ? & B&J Clark. 1797)

Rimmer, Alfred Belgravia Magazine, Vol 14, 1881

Sheahan, James Joseph - A History of Buckinghamshire, 1862. 

Guide to Marlow 1891 - South Bucks Standard - with thanks to Michael Eagleton. 

Willis, Browne Notitia Parliamentaria or a history of the counties, cities and borough of England and Wales. Vol 1. (Robert Gosling. 1730)

1833 Parish Assessment, transcribed  by Charlotte from the original notebook owned by our family 

The Royal River - The Thames from Source to Sea (Cassell 1885)

Law Journal 1832 (E B Ince 1837)

The Ecclesiologist Vol 6 (1847)

Temple Bar Magazine For Town and Country Readers Vol 15 Ward & Locke 1865. 

South Bucks Standard 12 June 1895, 2 July 1897 

Reading Mercury 21 September & 7 December 1829, 8 October 1832

Northampton Mercury 13 August 1791 via the BNA

The Building News and Engineers Journal,  17 February 1882

Notes on the old Parish Church at Great Marlow, by Alfred Heneage Cocks, 1900 as read to the Bucks Archaeological Society on their annual outing. [Undated typed report, and as per Records of Buckinghamshire - Bucks Archaeological Society, 1905 digitised by Google and supplied by InternetArchive.org ]

'House of Lords Journal Volume 63: 28 March 1831', in Journal of the House of Lords: Volume 63, 1830-1831 (London, [n.d.]), pp. 383-390. British History Online http://www.british-history.ac.uk/lords-jrnl/vol63/pp383-390 [accessed 7 February 2020]

The Builder September 25th 1875. Vol 33. 

Windsor and Eton Express, 01 November 1834. 


©Marlow Ancestors















PHOTO ID ANYONE?

 Can anyone help a fellow family history researcher Linda identify where this staff photo may have been taken in Marlow? Underneath are some...